|

The
Attorney General of the United States of America
Eric Holder
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did U.S. Attorney General
Secretly Counsel Land? |
The affidavit of Mr. Robert D. Douglas, dated Sept.
26, sworn before Mr. Lamar Rozier, notary public in the state of
Georgia, Bacon County, submitted in support of Attorney Orly Taitz’s
latest Motion of Recusal against Judge Clay D. Land.
His
affidavit reads as follows:
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, Lamar
Rozier
on this 26th day of September, 2009, personally
appeared Robert D. Douglas, known to me to be a credible person and
of lawful age, who being by me first duly shown on his oath deposes
and says:
On the day of he hearing for Major Stephan Cook
before Federal Judge Clay D. Land, Columbus, Ga., my wife, my wife’s
sister, her husband and I had entered the little coffee shop
directly across from the Court House while waiting for the doors to
open to the public. I was sitting in the small seating area,
set aside for their customers, while facing and looking directly at
the entrance to the shop. All persons entering had to pass withing
8-10 feet from where I was sitting.
I looked up and
immediately recognized an individual entering and approaching the
serving counter, due to his well known TV displayed distinguishing
features: his trim upper lip mustache, not large of stature and
general olive complexion. I knew instantly it was non other
than Eric Holder, the current Attorney General of the United States.
I called this to the attention of those present and all agreed it
appeared to be who I readily recognized. He entered unguarded,
no accompanying entourage and probably thought he would not be
recognized.
Red flags went up immediately in my mind and the
questions remain, as yet. Why does the Attorney General of the
United States need to be present in an obscure hearing well of his
beaten path? Could it possible be, since Holder did not
present himself in open court, he may have had a little "whisper in
the ear" to a Federal Judge in order to bias his judicial vision and
adhere to the President’s agenda of obstruction?
Only Judge
Clay D. Land can answer those question.
Robert D. Douglas
[address redacted]
Holder’s presence is not that unbelievable, because quite
contrary to the logic of their position Obama supporters have
consistently shown irrational passion to defend Obama from what they
claim are ridiculous charges.
Update 10/04/2009 -- 6:30 PM EDST:
Indeed, the lengths
Obama’s supporters will go to deny the facts, can be seen from one
comment at The Right Side of Life, where it is claimed that this
affidavit, transcribed above, has not been submitted as evidence on
Judge Land’s Docket. Also in the comment section of TRSOL article, there
is a link to Holder’s schedule for the day, which leaves a seemingly 18
hour window between 9PM July 15th, and 3 PM, July 16th, Eastern Daylight
Savings Time. |
| Eric Holder Meets
With CAIR |
|
Debbie Schlussel says
Politico’s Josh Gerstein posted a "scoop" -- which wasn’t a scoop at
all, since she broke the story
seven and
nine months ago. And, of course, Politico’s partner in
promotion and denying proper credit where it’s due, Matt Drudge,
followed suit linking to the unoriginal piece.
The story was ostensibly about Attorney General Eric Holder speaking
to a group of left-wing interest groups, including
CAIR, but it was mostly about how the group regularly meets with the
FBI, including CAIR-Michigan Executive Director Dawud Walid (DS
exclusive reporting: real name, Delano Anthony Willis, Jr., who has
quite a rap sheet). This, as the story notes, violates the FBI
claim they won’t meet with the extremist CAIR -– the Council on American
Islamic Relations. But, hello . . ., I reported months ago that
they were still
meeting with each other and that the embargo/boycott/ban was bogus.
Phony. A lie. A fraud. Fiction.
The FBI is still meeting with CAIR. CAIR-Michigan was
still meeting with the FBI as part of a larger "dialog" group of
Arabs and Muslims.
|
| Is Holder Stonewalling New Black Panther
Inquiry? |
Congressman Frank Wolf (R-Va.), a Philadelphia
native, and House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member, Lamar Smith
(R-Texas) sent a letter, on November 10, to Attorney General Eric Holder
requesting information about the Justice Department’s inquiry into
the sudden and unusual dismissal of voter intimidation charges against
the New Black Panther Party.
The congressmen are concerned that
the Justice Department (DOJ) is using the investigation as a means to
continue stonewalling Congress in this matter. It has been three
months since DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility initiated an
investigation at the request of Smith and Wolf.
Yet, despite
repeated requests made during the past three months DOJ has not provided
Congress with a clear explanation for why the Civil Rights Division
dismissed the complaint.
According to Messrs. Smith and Wolf,
"Congress and the American people must have confidence that the
Department’s Voting Rights Act enforcement is free of improper political
motives … it is important for Congress, in furtherance of its oversight
obligations, to receive answers before the end of this year -- before we
enter a political season" so that voters can be assured that voter
intimidation will not be tolerated.
Justice Department attorneys
filed charges in January against three individuals and the New Black
Panther Party for allegedly threatening voters at a poll in Philadelphia
during last November’s presidential election. The Justice
Department effectively won the case when the defendants declined to
appear before the court and challenge the charges.
Yet, when the
Obama administration took control of the Justice Department, the case
against the Democratic Party’s political ally was suddenly dropped.
There were no new facts or evidence to justify the decision. The
impression that politics played a role in the decision has been a source
of concern for Rep. Wolf who has been a strident defender of voting
rights.
Not only has Congress made unanswered inquiries into this
matter, so too has the U.S. Civil Rights Commission. The
Commission’s chairman, Gerald Reynolds, sent a letter on September 30 to
Mr. Holder saying the responses were "overdue" and asking for
"Department officials to fully cooperate" with the Commission’s
investigation as required by federal law.
Mr. Reynolds noted that
the Commission still has not received any of the documents they
requested in their initial June inquiries. He said this
information is needed because the Commission is responsible to
investigate voting rights deprivations and evaluate federal enforcement
of federal voting rights laws. They want to form an independent
opinion about DOJ’s enforcement actions and the potential impact on
future voter intimidation enforcement. It may also try "to
determine whether any decisions in the case were induced or affected by
improper influences."
As of this date, neither members of
Congress nor members of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission have called for
a special prosecutor to be appointed to investigate the matter. |
| ACORN and Justice
Department Plot Thickens |
Following the courageous
expose by two young investigative journalists released on the
pages of this very blog, there were widespread calls for a U.S.
Department of Justice investigation into the
criminal enterprise that is ACORN. One would
think there would be swift, decisive action from the administration that
promised to be the most transparent in history. Despite the
urging
of some in congress and
action on the regional level, and an
internal investigation into funding,
terrorist sympathizer U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
refuses to appoint a special prosecutor to oversee a criminal
investigation of ACORN. There’s no evidence that any internal
investigation is ongoing or making any progress since a 2008
request from Indiana’s Secretary of State.
Instead, Obama’s political arm is
attempting to dismiss it as a "fear campaign" while
ACORN insinuates that it is racist. Yes, they are still playing
that card.
What’s Holder’s hold-up? One major factor of course is that
ACORN serves as a taxpayer-funded Democrat army.
As with unions, it behooves Democrats to ignore
corruption amongst the ranks of the powerful forces that
elect them. What appears on the surface to be mere
political payback for a job well done is in fact much more insidious.
One family’s involvement with ACORN and the Obama administration is of
particular interest and elucidates the complicated web of connections
and cash behind ACORN and Obama.
Meet the Ratners
here . . .
Meanwhile, ACORN is
suing
the federal government, saying that Congress violated the U.S.
Constitution when it barred the group from receiving federal funds --
only in America!
|
| |

©
Copyright Beckwith 2009
All right reserved
|