Global Cover-Up

Custom Search

  

  

Global domination is obviously their goal
 

 

 


help fight the media
  
 

 

 

 

Globalist Cover-Up Hiding Obama's Past

Mychal Massie says Barack Obama has spent (or had spent for him) between $1.8 million and $3.2 million in legal fees to keep his personal records secret.  These include his birth certificate, his college records and all else that could provide more insight into his past.

But why?  Who spends that kind of money to keep their records hidden unless they have something to hide?  And if someone (especially a political figure, not to mention a sitting president) is willing to go to such lengths, it is reasonable to believe he has something to hide.  It is reasonable to believe that whatever it is they are hiding would be damning if revealed.  What could it be that Obama is so fearful of having revealed?

Consider the kind of power it takes to command such silence.  Let's face it -- there is nothing not known that cannot be made known -- Jimmy Hoffa's resting place notwithstanding.

Let's first start with what it takes to keep the cacophony of silence and complicit cover-up silent and covered up.

Joan Swirsky writes that Douglas Hagmann, in an interview with Dr. Laurie Roth, revealed, "The reason for the media blackout about [Obama's] birth-certificate issue was nothing less than organized Mafia-like dire threats to members of the media, issued not only from the heads of major TV and radio stations, but also from Federal Communication Commission officials.  According to Hagmann and [his investigative partner] Judi McCleod, who conducted a nine-month investigation and documented their findings scrupulously," threats were made to fire major talk-show hosts if they mentioned Obama's birth certificate, threats were made by FCC officials to yank broadcasting licenses, and memos were circulated by corporate TV headquarters to all on-air employees advising them not to mention the birth-certificate issue, his lawyer's license or his college records.

According to Swirsky, during the interview Hagmann and McCleod alluded to e-mails and other evidence in their possession -- copies of which, they said, were secreted in several locations.

But the question that begs answering is: Why go to such lengths to keep documents away from public scrutiny?  The birth-certificate issue is only a critical problem if, as many believe, it contradicts Obama's citizenship story.  And why prevent access to college records or restrict inquiry concerning his law license?

An even more pressing question is: How does a person like Obama -- a nobody from nowhere -- come to command such power and money so as to pull this off?  Think about what it takes for a presidential candidate, and now sitting president, to have such power.

The answer can only be that Obama is the front man for something far more sinister.  One person, without the strength and backing of a cabal capable of toppling governments and affecting worldwide currencies, etc., could not even consider such an undertaking, much less pull it off.

Ergo, the logical conclusion must then be that behind Obama there exists a group or organization so powerful and so sinister that they are able not just to influence global policy, but to control it.  I repeat for the record, Obama in and of himself cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, singularly demand that every major media outlet ignore investigating that which could potentially make Woodward and Bernstein's investigation into President Nixon pale in comparison.

Global domination is obviously their goal, but what in Obama's background threatens to derail them if it were exposed?  Rumors and suspicions abound pursuant to his citizenship, but if someone has enough power to silence a worldwide press and media, they would certainly have the ability to forge or recreate birth documents.

Also, Obama didn't go to school in a vacuum.  If there were something in his college records or if he had committed a crime or whatever, other students would know it and those persons would have by now leaked same to a credible source or outlet.

But there is one thing that wouldn't be as accessible to public scrutiny and that is his medical records.  If in his background there is evidence of emotional breakdown, susceptibility to breakdown, emotional instability or something similar and it became known, it is the one thing that could derail the objectives of the power behind him.

I'm not an investigative journalist.  I write opinion, and it is my opinion that Obama is but the tip of something much larger, and if same were to become known it would reverberate worldwide.  If he isn't, then he should make the requested records available immediately.  No other president or leader -- not Castro, not Chavez, not Clinton, not Khrushchev -- has demanded and received the secrecy he has.  No one was capable of such a feat until now.

It is time, no matter the risk or the cost, for investigators and reporters to do their jobs.  The American public has the right to know the truth about Obama.
Did This Well-Known Socialist Help Invent A History For Obama
Miki Booth says the evidence is all there for anyone to see if they take the time to look.  Zbigniew Brzezinski has "spoon-fed" Obama ever since he took him under his wing from Occidental College in 1980, apprenticed him through his first job in Pakistan and Afghanistan to his second job at Business International Corp. and ultimately, by manufacturing a background, faking his academic credentials and resume, to the top job in America.

Brzezinski was National Security Advisor to Jimmy Carter from 1977-1981 and a professor at Columbia University 1960-1989 where he taught at the Institute of Communist Affairs.  Heís a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, trustee of the Trilateral Commission and has attended Bilderberg meetings.  Heís still a predominant presence in Obamaís "inner sanctum" and conveniently located near the White House at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies where heís Professor of American Foreign Policy.

Obama cannot be questioned about any of this because, "Itís a matter of national security."  No one will talk about the fake birth certificate because, "Itís a matter of national security."  There is no attempt to investigate his stolen social security number, originally issued in CT, because "Itís a matter of national security."

Word is, the White House Press Corps members will have their credentials yanked if they were to ask Obama about his Oxy or Columbia days, his work at BIC, a well-known CIA front, or his trips to Pakistan.  Also on the list of banned questions is the birth certificate, his name Barry Soetero and his Indonesian passport of that name.

All the FOX News folks have gotten the word as to whatís off limits, too.  Beck can go as far as linking all the players destroying our country but canít mention the birth certificate.  He "busted" Obamaís mother for her involvement with Shore Bank but doesnít talk about her working for Asia Development Bank in Karachi, Pakistan while living in a five-star hotel for years laundering money to aid Mujahadeen and Taliban.  Oops, thatís CIA and Pakistan; canít go there.  If you do, the FCC will shut you down so fast your head will spin.

Every once in a while, though, Obama really blows it and states a falsehood that sends his handlers into a panicked frenzy to cover his misstatement.  As we all know, mistakes are made when you hurriedly try to fix an error.  Obamaís error was saying that he signed up for selective service when he graduated from high school.  That would be 1979 when there was no draft.  The selective service was reinstituted in 1980 and so a record for Obama had to be created.  Unfortunately for Obamaís "fixers" creating a record after the fact is a difficult thing to do and faced with time constraints they were forced to settle on a flawed document and probably unwittingly forever linked that document to another fraud, his social security number.

Brzezinski has been there for Obama all along and their secrets have to stay hidden because of national security measures.  Itís really sad that America has been hijacked by wicked people like Brzezinski, Soros, Kissinger, the Clintons, Obama and all the godless members of their One World team.

If our country is to survive, we only need one brave patriot to break through the CIAís code of silence into the mainstream and let the treasonous pieces fall where they may.
If Obama Is Natural-Born, Why Suppress Evidence?
John Gaski asks what of the cumulative evidence against our maybe-president's citizenship (eligibility, please)?  Let the reader judge the balance and weight of a summary appraisal.  (Curious machinations over a crucial piece of evidence, a birth certificate of all things, changed the balance for me.)

1.  If B.H. Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen, those who flack for him should be able to do better than the unpersuasive defense they have offered.

More specifically damning, haven't you noticed how Obama apologists rarely offer a substantive argument for his citizenship (eligibility) at all, but instead use personal attack, invective, sophistry, demagogy and ridicule?  The bottom line: If you believe that the artist formerly known as Barry Soetoro really is a natural U.S. citizen, prove it.  If the subject of the controversy cannot, others are not likely to be able to either.

(When this writer uses attack, ridicule, etc., it is not gratuitous but grows from the substance, such as the appearance of an insidious political provocation and national existential emergency, as here.)

2.  A rhetorical question: If B.H. Obama is not hiding something terrible in his birth records, why has he spent millions covering them up?  Maybe it is something else entirely, but maybe not -- and ultimately it may not matter, for this deductive reason: Obama knows the cover-up only creates grave public suspicion about his constitutional eligibility, at least in responsible quarters, so if something else is the real secret, it must be something as bad or worse.

3. An attempted exculpatory answer has actually come from Obama's fiercest opponents.  Conservative radio hosts sometimes mention the insider belief that they are being sandbagged or "rope-a-doped," that the birth certificate would reveal valid Hawaiian origin (don't forget the British-Kenyan origin), and Obama is saving it to discredit them or Republicans if they raise the issue.

This amounts to pure, bald speculation, however, because those radio talkers do not disclose any basis.  By way of rebuttal, the speculation does not seem to add up for the following reason.  The 2008 election against John McCain was very close until nearly the end, and the primary campaign against Hillary Clinton even closer.  A late, unforeseen turn of events, and either race could have gone the other way.

Even liberal political campaign organizations are very conservative tactically.  If the Obama side had such a master-stroke ace-in-the-hole, it would have been beyond imprudent not to play it in or near the endgame.  Barack Obama, or whatever his real name is, may be a radical, but he is not crazy and far from stupid (I'm not convinced).

Continue reading page two here . . .
Kenya Investigated Obama "African Birth"
Jerome R. Corsi is reporting that a leaked document shows that a Kenyan official urged probe of possible "criminal tampering."
    

click image for large copy
    
Documents obtained by WorldNetDaily indicate the Kenyan government investigated the possibility that Obama was born in the East African nation.

Two letters purportedly written by Kenya's immigration secretary during the 2008 U.S. presidential election campaign stated that officials in Nairobi could not find evidence Obama was born in Kenya, but the official said the government had "information" that relevant birth records may have been removed or were missing.

Emmanuel Kisombe, the permanent secretary in the Ministry for Immigration and Registration of Persons, wrote a letter in July 2008 in reply to a letter from the U.S. ambassador in Nairobi that raised the possibility with Kenyan officials that Obama was born in their country.

Kisombe wrote another letter on the issue, this time to Kenya's Criminal Investigation Department, a few days before the Nov. 4 presidential election in the U.S.

Kisombe, 56, has been in public service since 1979, according to his bio.  He became principal administrative secretary in the Office of the President in 2004 and was appointed permanent secretary for Immigration and Registration of Persons on Dec. 7, 2005.

His Oct. 22, 2008, letter to Simon Karanja Gatiba, director of the Criminal Investigation Department, indicated an investigation into the possibility Obama was born in Kenya was instigated at the level of the Kenyan Cabinet.

There's more here . . .

And don't forget all of these references to Obama's Kenyan birth while your contemplating Obama's latest bogus birth document.

And the Obamamedia says this isn't an issue.  Hah!
Comments . . .
***  
 

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009 - 2011

All right reserved