These items are archived in
chronological order and is evolving . . .
Why Is John McCain Defending His
McCain: "You Do Not Have To Be Scared" of
Obama as President (00:15)
The Republican Party is complicit in
Obama’s coup d'état. They became a party to the conspiracy, and
the Democrats compromised the Republican candidate when Leahy and
company "resolved" that John McCain was/is a "natural born" citizen.
He isn’t, and was/is equally ineligible to serve as CiC.
Democrats neutered McCain who never said a word about Rev. Wright, Bill
Ayers, Alice Palmer, and the rest of the communists, socialists, black
nationalists, and other assorted dirtbags that form Obama’s closest and
longest lasting relationships and associations.
Most members of
Congress are attorneys. The judges too. They all studied the
Constitution. They know the law (at least enough to pass the bar).
They know Obama is ineligible, but they made a deal with the devil and
now have to live with it.
It Started In 2006
academics believe being a "natural born" citizen is a relic, including
Obama law firm associate Sarah Herlihy, who wrote
"Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement," for Chicago-Kent Law
Review in 2006. Cass Sunstein, Thomas Friedman, Barney Frank, a phalanx of Obama
supporters are cited.
Claire McCaskill On Board Early
wasted no time establishing herself in Congress after her 2006 election
victory, challenging the Democratic leadership on issues such as
her star to the Democratic Party’s new standard-bearer, Barack Obama.
Obama And McCain Both Have A Problem
In early 2008, the McCain and Obama campaigns recognized
there might be a problem with their candidates' eligibility.
McCain was born in a
foreign country, and Obama's father was a foreign
alien, and a temporary visitor to the United States on a student visa.
Hillary, still in the campaign, was slowly being edged to the side by
the Democratic Party power-brokers.
On February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration. That bill was known
as S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act. The
bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton
(D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK).
Bill S. 2678 attempted to change article II, section 1,
clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the
requirements of being a "natural born citizen" and hence; the entitlement to
run for President of the United States. This bill met the same fate that
similar attempts to change the Constitution have in the past.
Within only five
short weeks after Senate Bill 2678 faded from the floor, we find Sen.
Claire McCaskill back again, making another attempt with
Senate Resolution 511. On
April 10, 2008, she introduced a secondary proposal in the form of a
non-binding resolution, recognizing John McCain as a "natural born
citizen" in defiance of the Constitution. Curiously, it contained
the same identical co-sponsors, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
Sen. Leahy Says Two US Citizen Parents
-- And Obama Agrees
10, 2008, Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
introduced a resolution expressing the sense of the U.S. Senate that
presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) was a "natural born"
Citizen, as specified in the Constitution and eligible to run for
president. Sen. McCaskill knew Obama was not a U.S. Citizen,
that’s why she introduced this bill -- dressing it up to look like it
was in Sen. John McCain's cause.
It was during the bill's hearing
that Sen. Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee,
made the following statement:
"Because he was born to American citizens, there is no
doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen,"
Leahy. "I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the
At a Judiciary Committee hearing on April 3, Leahy asked
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, himself a former Federal
judge, if he had doubts that McCain was eligible to serve as President.
"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are
American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,"
"That is mine, too,"
interesting here is that Sen. Leahy, the Chairman of the Senate
Judiciary, confirms that a "natural born" citizen is the child of
American citizen parents.
Parents -- that's two. That's BOTH
Every time the words, "citizen" and "parent," are used
by Sen. Leahy and Sec. Chertoff, the plural case, "citizens" and
"parents," is used. The plural case is the operative case.
It is Sen. Leahy's opinion -- his own recorded words, in a formal Senate
Resolution and on his U. S.
Senate website -- that Barack Obama is not a "natural born"
citizen, and therefore not eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief,
regardless of his birthplace.
Obama had one American parent
--singular -- his mother. His father was a citizen of Kenya, and a
subject of Great Britain.
Obama, himself, "at birth," was a
citizen of Kenya, and a subject of Great Britain -- he
says so on his own campaign website.
This fact introduces the concept of "divided loyalties," -- the reason
the founders created the eligibility requirement in the first place -- a
fact that further underlines
The source of this information is Sen. Leahy's own website.
The webpage contains a statement about the resolution; the resolution, itself;
the Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); and an excerpt of Sec.
The plural word "parents" is used four
times. When used to identify the parents, the word "citizens" is used
five times. That's nine times that Sen. Leahy, on his own website describes the
eligibility requirement. There is NO PLACE in any of these four
documents where the singular case of "parent" or "citizen" is used.
McCain Lawyers Investigated Obama
asked earlier this week, if questions over Obama's citizenship were
valid, wouldn't they have come out during the presidential campaign?
David Weigel talked with Trevor Potter and other lawyers for Sen.
John McCain's presidential campaign who said that they did look into the
Obama citizenship rumors and found them without merit.
Potter: "To the extent that we could, we looked into the substantive
side of these allegations. We never saw any evidence that
then-Senator Obama had been born outside of the United States. We
saw rumors, but nothing that could be sourced to evidence. There
were no statements and no documents that suggested he was born somewhere
else. On the other side, there was proof that he was born in
Hawaii. There was a certificate issued
by the state's Department of Health, and the responsible official in the
state saying that he had personally seen the original certificate [not
so]. There was a
announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser, which would be very
difficult to invent or plant 47 years in advance.
So all McCain's high-priced lawyers
looked at was jus soli
(birthplace) when evaluating Obama's eligibility. They neglected
Obama's at birth status
as Kenyan citizen and British subject. It was inconvenient.
All those high-priced lawyers know that "natural born" requires both
tests -- jus solis AND jus sanguinis. Two American citizen
parents, and born in the USA. They overlooked it. It was
eligible for the Office of the President of the United States (POTUS),
NEVER have first generation ties to a foreign nation, whereas ineligible
persons always do. ALL statutory citizens are born with a tie to
another nation by birthplace and/or blood, but NEVER is that the case
with "natural born" citizens who have only American ties.
Did Republicans Purposely Run An Ineligible
John F. Sweeney says, that in discussions
concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barrack Hussein Obama II
for the office of President of the United States, many point out that if
there were a real issue, the Republicans would have leveraged it in 2008
to retain control of the White House. But it was well-documented
at the time, and additional documentation and analysis have established,
that John McCain’s eligibility was in question as well. With that
being the case, why would the Republicans nominate a candidate who might
not be constitutionally eligible to serve in the office?
answer may be a simple one -- the 2008 race was going to the Democrats
and the Republicans did not want a leading candidate for 2012 to lose or
be roughed up during the campaign. So the solution -- let the man
who needed to win in 2008, if he was ever going to be president, run --
even if he might not be constitutionally eligible. Was this a
grand conspiracy by the Republican Party? No, it was just simple
pragmatic political strategy.
The Republicans had few things
going for them in 2007 and 2008. They had lost the Congress in the
2006 elections, and they had a president who was losing popularity as an
unpopular war dragged on. Even if things had been going relatively
well, history was against a third straight term in the White House.
Since 1953, only once had the White House been occupied by a party more
than eight consecutive years, and that was when George H. Bush rode
Ronald Reagan’s popularity to take the 1988 election. Clearly,
2008 was not like 1988, and it was unlikely the Republicans were going
to keep the White House. They knew it, and they knew it early.
So when John McCain showed some strength in the primaries, the other
front-runners backed off. They knew the odds of winning in 2008
were long. So they avoided going into the 2008 Presidential buzz
saw. John McCain had no choice but to make a final and gallant run
for the office. The year 2008 was his last stand as a presidential
candidate. He was 71 years old. No president has ever been
elected for his first term after his 70th birthday. Stories and
articles were popping up about McCain’s age in 2008, and polls showed it
was a negative factor. If it was a negative issue at age 71 in
2008, it will be a killer issue in 2012 when John McCain will be 75
So for the Republican Party, the setup in the
presidential race looked straightforward in 2008. There was almost
no chance to win, no matter who the nominee was. So they nominated
the only guy who cannot run in future races: John McCain.
Republican Party aware of John McCain’s eligibility issue?
Of course it was.
the US Congress -- is there not even one among you, who will stand by
your oath of office and state unequivocally that Barack Hussein Obama is
not a natural born citizen and is, therefore, ineligible for the office
of President of the United States?
It serves no purpose here for
me to present arguments supporting a case against Obama’s eligibility or
recite the background and intent of the natural born clause of the
Constitution. That information is already available
Why does Congress
feign ignorance, continue a conspiracy of silence and display blatant
cowardice in regard to this issue? Is it that members of Congress
are too politically correct, too complicit in a cover-up and are just
stalling in the desperate hope that Obama is not re-elected?
happens then, if through some tragic mistake of history, Obama is
re-elected? Congress could find themselves, not only in
dereliction of their duty, but potentially contributing to the
destruction of our republic.
Edwin Vieira, a leading
Obama’s questionable eligibility, if left unresolved, could become
precedent and justification for both continuing the erosion of the
Constitution and abolishing the rights it provides to all Americans:
"If Obama turns out to be nothing more than
an usurper who has fraudulently seized control of the Presidency,
not only will the Constitution have been egregiously flouted, but
also this whole country could be, likely will be, destroyed as a
consequence. And if this country is even credibly threatened
with destruction, every American will be harmed -- irretrievably,
should the threat become actuality -- including those who voted or
intend to vote for Obama, who are also part of We the People.
Therefore, in this situation, any and every American must have
"standing" to demand -- and must demand, both in judicial fora and
in the fora of public opinion that Obama immediately and
conclusively prove himself eligible for "the Office of President."
Not anything about Obama’s ineligibility is either
a surprise or an accident.
As it turned out, Senator John McCain
was the perfect Republican opponent for Obama. Although the
argument is now moot, McCain also had
under the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution.
controversy surrounding McCain’s eligibility was perfectly exploited by
Obama’s allies in the main stream media and by liberal legal scholars
both of whom feigned sincerity in their quest to interpret correctly the
text and the intent of the Constitution.
The charade continued on
the floor of the Senate, where Republicans and Democrats colluded by
passing the non-binding and phony
Senate Resolution 511
declaring John McCain a natural born citizen and, thereby, providing
Obama the smokescreen he needed to circumvent the Constitution.
So when SR 511 was passed in a non-recorded vote on April 30, 2008,
the fix was in and Congress
lowered an iron curtain of silence about Obama’s ineligibility, which
has continued to this day.
Obama Should Be President Of Kenya
Republicans were quiet because they were just as complicit in
supporting McCain, whom the Democrat Senate whitewashed with SR 511 and
the Obama-McCaskill SB 2678 during the spring of 2008. They are willing
crooks, and one way or another, in the famous words of Obama’s spiritual
adviser for two decades, "The chickens are coming home to roost." They
should all be prosecuted, because all of them knew that Obama was born
to an alien father. Obama told us. He also told that us that he was
"native born," not "natural born" and that "at birth" was
a "subject" of the British Commonwealth.
Would our founders and
framers have written a constitution which would sanction as president,
our sovereign, the son, born to and a subject of our enemy Great
Britain? Not hardly.
says the problem with John McCain’s campaign ‘against’ Obama in
2008–and all the republicans–was that he intended to lose all along.
When he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate, he almost won the
election because of her popularity. So he had to undermine her and his
republican, luciferian, and banking cabal had to manufacture an economic
crisis quickly, and engineer his poor response, to make sure Obama ‘won’
the election. Not to mention that McCain lost more than 10 million
republican votes because they simply stayed home and wouldn’t vote for
him. It will be just the same with Mitt Romney–we don’t want him as our
candidate but the republicans have once again engineered their own
defeat just to play games with the demon-crats.
Its time that
John McCain was confronted and recalled. There are many of us in Arizona
that will be initiating a recall campaign of John McCain very soon, and
soon enough you will see our fundraising efforts posted everywhere. We
will need about a quarter of a million signatures–Maricopa County alone
could provide most of them…considering McCain’s obvious treason involved
in purposely losing to, failing to expose, and current collaboration
Here is an open letter to McCain from Dr. David Earl-Graef
Not so long ago in the military there were
certain acts looked upon with such disdain that we seldom even spoke
of them. In fact, we seldom actually encountered them, so there was
no need. One is cowardice and another is worse, much worse –treason.
For the sake of others reading this letter, I point out that all
service members enlisted and officer alike takes an Oath. While the
Oaths are slightly different we are individually bound to them. What
follows is the Oath taken by the Officers:
“I, (state your
name), having been appointed a (rank) in the United States (branch
of service), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies,
foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental
reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and
faithfully discharge the office upon which I am about to enter. So
help me God.”
It is important for those seeing this for the
first time to note, the Oath for officers specifically states that
the Constitution will be supported and defended against all enemies
and it acknowledges that the enemy may be found on foreign soil or
in one’s own backyard. I would even say an enemy can arise in
oneself if the desires of personal gain or power or sense of self
importance are allowed to become greater than the desire to honor
ones Oath. Perhaps indeed, this is the greatest enemy for none are
immune to it and it is insidious in is appearance.
not agree, Senator McCain, it is implicit that a United States
Military Officer or Public servant who takes this oath and then
conspires or is a party to an act or actions that seeks to undermine
by purpose of evasion, the spirit and intent of the Constitution of
the United States would fit the definition a traitor? Would you not
also agree that those who take the Oath are not at liberty to pick
and choose which parts of the Constitution they will defend while
choosing to ignore others? One part is not separable from the others
just as we, as a Nation, are not separable from the sovereignty of
our creator from which our rights come.
Some time ago, I
wrote you a personal letter pleading with you to honor your oath you
took as a Military officer and then again as a United States
Senator. The letter cover was clearly marked that the contents were
personal and for you only. While it was initially returned unopened-
the second mailing was not, so I must assume you received it.
In my letter I pleaded with you to once again display the
courage you did as young Naval Aviator and then as a POW in Vietnam.
I asked you to stop and consider if you had put your own ambitions
and sense of self importance in front of your duty. I asked you to
step forward and apologize to the Nation for not being honest with
us. I assured you and I had full confidence that such an act of
humility would be accepted and the American People would forgive you
of your trespass, for your action would spare us from an ongoing
injustice of such proportion our Nation has never seen before. I
pleaded with you for the good of our Nation and even for your own
redemption to come forward and expose the greatest fraud that has
been and is being perpetrated on the American people; a fraud in
which you yourself played a part. I acknowledged how difficult it
would be and I also acknowledged the necessity of it just the same.
I NEVER received an answer-nothing from you, not so much as single
word. Not an explanation-nothing. The same silence you exhibited
during the 2008 campaign.
So now I am given no choice but to
write this for all to see. I cannot find the words to describe the
extent of my disappointment but only state that it grieves me
immensely as I trusted you and respected you as a fellow military
officer. Before I discovered what I am about to tell the Citizens, I
even gave you something that was precious to me, my vote for you to
become the President of the United States. In this moment, I would
rather have suffered total disenfranchisement from my right to vote,
than to bear the shame and embarrassment that I gave my vote to you.
As a US Military officer, in keeping with my oath of office I
demand that you, Sen. John Sydney McCain III, answer not to me but
to the to the Citizens of the United States why you are not guilty
of treason. Please show them that I am in error and that you did not
betray your Oath as an Officer and as a Representative of the
People. Explain to them why your name and that of Barrack Hussein
Obama BOTH appear on Senate resolution 511 declaring you John Sydney
McCain III a “Natural Born Citizen” by virtue that BOTH of your
parents were US Citizens regardless you were not born on sovereign
I am not going to belabor myself explaining to you
the basis for my assertion that neither you or Barack Hussein Obama
meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of POTUS. I
am certain you know what defines a “Natural Born Citizen “and
America is leaning quickly. What I am clearly stating is that both
you and Barak Obama had SERIOUS questions regarding your
qualifications under Art. II section 1 of the United States
Constitution. I am clearly stating that BOTH your names are in the
Congressional record of SR 511. Tell me how this does not show that
there was collusion between you and Barack Hussein Obama to
undermine the Constitution of The United States. Why is Barack
Hussein Obamas name on that document with yours? Is this what bought
your silence during the campaign?
Many people believe that if
Barack Obama was not qualified to hold the office YOU would have
brought this up during the campaign. Those that are less informed
and support Barack Obama use this claim as “proof” that Barack Obama
is himself qualified. They use this to ridicule and demean the very
citizens you represent and you do absolutely nothing except remain
silent on the issue and let them bear the brunt of the insults. You
stood by while Lt Col Terry Lakin was stripped of his honor,
everything taken from him to include his freedom just as you were in
Vietnam and you did NOTHING. Do you not think the People have a
right to an explanation? Tell them plainly why YOU would not be
BEHOLDING to Barack Obama on the very issue of eligibility?
It is not now nor ever was my intent to publically humiliate you, or
in any way bring disrespect upon the office of the Senate that you
occupy. I hope you see that you have given me no choice but to move
this to the public arena. I will not remain silent while I see our
Constitution shredded before my eyes by what appears to be an act of
treason. You were elected to serve the people not yourself and you
are not above them. I am certain that this letter will make you
angry but I am not the one who betrayed my Oath, you are. Please, I
am asking you again to step forward and do what is right for
yourself and the country. We all have made mistakes and we all are
entitled to forgiveness but only when we confess those mistakes and
ask for it.
If I am wrong I will withdraw my demand and offer
you a public apology and I will ask for forgiveness from you. If I
am right however I remind you that Judas Iscariot had his price, the
promise of 30 pieces of Silver. For him, in the end, he lost
everything to include his soul. No price is worth that. Certainly
not the Presidency, not your Senate seat – not even if one were to
gain the entire world. Was a Quid pro Quo in the form of a promise
of silence regarding the illegal candidacy of Barack Hussein Obama
your price? Did you commit treason or were you duped? I still
believe you have an opportunity to reconcile yourself to your Oath
of office and to the American people and to God; but the open door
to this opportunity will at some point close FOREVER and no amount
of pleading to the people will redeem you. The cloak of darkness
that has kept this from the American people is rapidly coming
unraveled. This fraud WILL BE EXPOSED and your part in it will not
be forgotten. You will be held accountable to the American people in
a court of law or before the Congress. Do not miss the opportunity
to step forward -the time is now not later.