Barack Obama -- Gullibles

The Gullibles

Custom Search

Me? A birther? Hell no!

I'll believe anything he says!

The Enemies Of The Birthers

The Gullibles don't question Obama's eligibility. These trusting, naive, innocent folks believe it is crazy, and/or improper to question Obama. The easiest way to identify a Gullible is their complete lack of curiosity and cynicism in the face of the gazillion contradictions that are facts and circumstances of the life of Barack Obama.

Most Gullibles are Obots, as you'd expect, but there are plenty of guys, like O'Reilly and Beck, and blogs like Redstate.com, who are Gullibles also. Almost all of our judges, politicians and journalists are committed Gullibles -- especially the journalists. The Gullibles favorite sport is attacking Birthers. The reason Gullibles attack Birthers is because of the Birthers' skepticism. Birthers don't buy Obama's brand of bullshit.

What we have here is one bunch that chug-a-lugged the Obama brew -- and one that says, "hey! wait-a-minute! what's in that stuff?"

The Gullibles ignore the fact that Obama's book, "Dreams...," his life's narrative, is a myth. In the introduction, Obama acknowledges his use of pseudonyms, composite characters, approximated dialogue and events out of chronological order. Outright lies and omissions are not noted for obvious reasons.

The Gullibles ignore the fact that Michelle Obama said that Senior and Anna were never married. She described Anna as "very young and very single when she had him (Obama)."

The Gullibles ignore the fact that their are dozens of reports of his Kenyan birth from responsible journalists and politicians -- including his wife Michelle -- on two separate occasions.

The Gullibles ignore the fact that four qualified examiners have investigated the Certification of Live Birth provided by the Obama Campaign to partisan web sites, and declared the copies that have been referenced by the world to be bogus electronic documents.

The Gullibles ignore the fact that Hawaii's Department of Health (DOH) has issued obfuscations and contradictions, and has been creatively using their rulebook to prevent the disclosure of the facts of Obama's birth records -- except the ones they chose. When that doesn't work, they change the rules. When that doesn't work, they build a firewall between the DOH and the public. When that doesn't work they pass a law that says they don't have to answer inquiries -- which is their job.

The Gullibles ignore the conflicting accounts of Obama's birthplace, even though Obama, himself has been quoted as saying he was born in two different hospitals -- and neither hospital has ever, ever confirmed Obama's birth at their facility.

I could go on all day identifying discrepancies in Obama's story. Here are a few of the hundreds and hundreds of pages in The Obama File that link to thousands and thousands of pages on the Web, that lay lie to Obama's narrative, demonstrate how little is KNOWN about this guy, and how dynamic his life story is. It evolves constantly.

Obama, or his people, lay down a scenario. An investigator investigates. The investigator finds the scenario is full of holes, or is an out and out fabrication -- and the story evolves -- so-and-so misspoke -- the reporter got it wrong -- somebody misremembered -- most often though, Obama just ignores it -- after all -- he won! -- this cycle is repeating constantly -- remember Rev. Wright, Obama's racist "mentor" -- Obama sat at his feet for 20 years and didn't hear a thing -- the Gullibles went, uh-huh!

Since the Obama's bogus Certification of Live Birth was first published in June 2008, there have been at least two additional incarnations of the document, each containing revisions that bear additional information allegedly "supporting" its authenticity. There isn't a week that goes by that another element in the Obama narrative doesn't change. And there isn't another week that goes by that something doesn't disappear from the Web.

Gullibles expend enormous energy attacking Birthers for expecting Obama to simply be straight with the American People -- who do have a right to know -- and a need to know. Who are you, Barack Obama, and who sent you? Will the real Barack Obama please stand up and present his credentials?

Like I say on my main page, "Barack Obama is referenced by name, rather than title, in these pages whenever possible -- except when used as part of a direct quote. The day Obama produces his bona fides for inspection by the American People, and demonstrates his eligibility to occupy the Office of the President of the United States of America, these pages will be amended to reflect his proper title."

This is like "The Emperors New Clothes" in real life -- Obama's narrative is his suit of clothes, and the Gullibles just love Obama's ever-changing threads, and they get upset when someone points out Obama is bare-assed naked.

Gullibles have to attack Birthers -- they know in their hearts he's nekked -- but he's their guy.

The Real Conspiracy Theorists

Joseph Farrah writes: There are many in the press today caricaturing me as a "conspiracy theorist" simply because I, like millions of other Americans, insist on actually seeing proof of Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility.

I've never alleged a conspiracy. Obama was given a free pass by an opponent who had his own eligibility issues. Not much of a conspiracy necessary -- especially with Obama accountable only to a fawning press and scared-of-their-shadows Republicans.

But "conspiracy theorist" is an easy epithet to hurl.

One good question to ask, the next time you hear someone call me that name, is this: "Who is Joseph Farah conspiring with?" I'd sure like to know the answer to that question.

I don't see a lot of high-profile or powerful people beating down my door to join "the conspiracy."

All I am doing -- and all I have ever done on this issue of constitutional eligibility -- is what I would expect every American citizen and especially every member of the press to do: Hold arguably the most powerful politician in the world to accountable to his pledges of "transparency," honesty, the rule of law, his oath of office and the same standard to which his lackluster, unworthy Republican opponent in the 2008 election was held.

Is that too much to ask? Does that really make me part of the "fringe" in America in 2010?

I make no apologies for pushing this issue. The more I am criticized, the more I realize I am really getting to Obama and his acolytes.

It's hardly a "conspiracy theory" to state the obvious: Obama has not proven he is constitutionally eligible. In fact, he has made no effort to do so. All he does is mau-mau about not questioning his citizenship.

If he can't stand being questioned, he has no business being in public office.

Continue reading here . . .