Obama v India

Custom Search

  

  

Doin' deals in Mumbai
 



help fight the media
  
 

 

 

 

 
Items on this page are archived in the order of discovery.

Obama Remembers Mumbai But Ignores Fort Hood

John Lillpop says Obama began his 10-day, pre-holiday Asia vacation in Mumbai, India by memorializing the victims of the terrorist attacks on Mumbai from two years ago.

In a somber and respectful tone, he declared, "We’ll never forget."

In making his remarks, Obama delivered an appropriate message about the tragic events of November 26, 2008 which resulted in the deaths of 173 innocent people.

All well and good.

Unfortunately, Obama’s staff must have forgotten an equally memorable terrorist attack, one that took place at Fort Hood, Texas on November 5, 2009.

Indeed, while Obama and his entourage were jetting off to India on what is believed to be a $200-million-a day junket, he was silent about the one year anniversary of the Fort Hood shooting in which jihadi Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan murdered 13 Americans and injured 30 others.

Why did Obama choose to ignore the victims of the Fort Hood massacre on the one-year anniversary of one of the worst mass shootings ever on an American military base?

Related:  Radical Islam Still Not Acknowledged As Cause Of Post Rampage

Pasha Obama
    
         
From Indian TV -- Karnataka No.1 English News displays an image of Obama wearing traditional Indian turban from 9:37 to 11:25 in a video report -- click here to watch entire report.

The Daily Mail (UK) says that not since the days of the Pharaohs or the more ludicrous Roman Emperors has a head of state travelled in such pomp and expensive grandeur as Barack Obama.

While lesser mortals -- the Pope, Queen Elizabeth and so on -- are usually happy to let their hosts handle most of the security and transport arrangements when they venture beyond their home shores, the United States creates a mini-America on the move to ensure that nothing is left to chance.

Read this extensive report, with photos, here . . .
Obama's Ignorance Of World Affairs On Full Display In India
Michael Filozof says when George W. Bush was sworn into office, he was mocked by his political enemies as a parochial idiot who had no understanding of world affairs.  That proved untrue.  By contrast Barack Obama was touted as a multicultural "citizen of the world" whose childhood residence in Indonesia, adult trips to Pakistan and Kenya, and Harvard degree were supposed proof of his sophistication.  Obama subsequently disproved this belief by making reference to "speaking Austrian" during a European speech and sending Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Russia to "press the reset button," (the word "reset" in Russian was misspelled) a stunt so stupid that a high school girl at a Model UN conference probably wouldn't do it.

Now, in his quasi-imperial trip to India, Obama has made ridiculous P.C.-inspired statements that managed to offend both India and Pakistan and reveal an astounding ignorance of South Asian politics and history.

First, Obama told an Indian audience that he supported India's bid to gain a permanent seat (and veto) on the UN Security Council.  Aside from the fact that this is unlikely to happen, the idea greatly offends Pakistan, a sworn enemy of India since both countries became independent in 1947.  While Obama's support for an Indian seat on the Security Council was greeted with applause in India, it was immediately denounced by Pakistan.  Pakistan is our "ally" in the war on terror, but it is very unstable, partially ungovernable, and likely harboring Osama bin Laden.  Obama gratuitously offended it by supporting its #1 enemy, India.  How can this possibly help our efforts in the Af-Pak theater of war?

Second, Obama contradicted centuries of Indian history when he told an Indian schoolgirl that Islam is a "religion of peace" and that only "extremists" corrupt it.  According to The Hindu newspaper, Obama said Islam is "a religion that reaffirms peace, fairness, tolerance.  I think all of us recognize that this great religion in the hands of a few extremists has been distorted by violence."  This must be an astonishingly false statement to Indian ears and to anyone with even a cursory knowledge of Indian history.

India has had virtually non-stop conflict with Islam since it was first invaded by Muslims in the seventh century.  Hindu India and Muslim Pakistan have been in a virtual state of war since 1947, when British India was partitioned along religious lines, resulting in nearly a million casualties.  Today, both India and Pakistan are nuclear-armed powers.  There have been at least three shooting wars since 1947 and constant low-grade war over Kashmir.  The attack on the Indian parliament by Muslim terrorists in 2001 and the Mumbai Massacre, perpetrated by Pakistani Muslims in 2008, are not the result of "extremists" who "distort" Islam but merely the latest incidents in centuries of war and conquest India has suffered at the hands of the "religion of peace."

It's clear that the Obama foreign policy isn't based on sophistication or even a basic knowledge of world affairs.  It's based purely on fatuous P.C. sentiments that meet with approval in faculty lounges, but are downright dangerous to American security in the real world.
 

© Copyright  Beckwith  2010
All right reserved