|
There
will be taxes
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items are posted in the order of discovery . . .
|
| Tax The Rich |
Also on the 31st, Obama
said he would pay for his proposed new programs, including mandatory
health insurance, by imposing higher taxes on "the wealthy" and raising
the tax on Social Security wages. He added, "What we have had
right now is a situation where we've cut taxes for people who don't need
them."
According to recent Gallup data, "The wealthiest 1 percent of the
population earn 19 percent of the income, but pay 37 percent of the
income tax. The top 10 percent pay 68 percent of the tab.
Meanwhile, the bottom 50 percent -- those below the median income level
-- now earn 13 percent of the income but pay just 3 percent of the
taxes.
Should government determine how much money people "need"?
This is Marxism: "from each according to his ability; to each according
to his need." |
| Double The Capital Gains Tax |
Economic conservatives have a special love for cutting capital gains
taxes. Not only do they feel it is one of the most destructive taxes
that exists, but it was the 1978 capital gains tax cut -- along with
Proposition 13 the same year in California -- that really launched the
supply-side tax revolution. Now Obama says he wants to nearly
double the capital gains tax rate. Here is what
he told CNBC's Maria Bartiromo last week:
"Well, you know, I haven't given a firm number. Here's my belief,
that we can't go back to some of the, you know, confiscatory rates that
existed in the past that distorted sound economics. And I
certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton, which was
28 percent. I would -- and my guess would be it would be
significantly lower than that. I think that we can have a capital
gains rate that is higher than 15 percent. If it -- and if it, you
know -- when I talk to people like Warren Buffett or others and I ask
them, you know, what's -- how much of a difference is it going to be if
it's 20 or 25 percent, they say, look, if it's within that range, then
it's not going to distort, I think, economic decision making."
My take: Obama got it wrong. The capital gains rate during the
Clinton administration fell from 28 percent at the beginning to 20
percent with the signing of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 in August of
that year. Interestingly, the economy managed only two years of
growth of 4 percent or more in the decade previous to the 1997 cap gains
cut -- but notched three straight years of such growth in 1997, 1998,
and 1999. |
| A Trillion Dollar Tax Increase |
An Obama presidency
could mean a Trillion Dollar tax increase.
The Urban Institute Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center has just
published a detailed analysis and comparison of the tax policies of
Senators McCain and Obama.
It concludes that compared to current policy, McCain would cut taxes by
$628 billion over the next 10 years and that Obama would raise them by
$734 billion over the same period. |
| No Taxes For Obama Though |
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama would raise taxes on
the rich, but as an investor, he seems eager
to cut his own.
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama wants to raises taxes on
the wealthy, but as a member of that social class, he isn't eager to
fall victim himself. He has invested at least $1 million in a fund that
yields tax-free income.
The Illinois senator's latest campaign-finance disclosure shows that his
investments have nearly tripled in the past two years to as much as $7.4
million, and his income in 2007 surged past $4 million, not counting his
government salary.
Obama reported accounts with Morgan Chase Private Client Asset
Management, an elite firm that deals only with the rich, as well as a
host of retirement accounts, some in the name of his wife, Michelle. |
The Global Poverty
Redistribution Act |
Obama has already
endorsed the U.N.-inspired giveaway known as the Global Poverty Act.
It’s estimated that filling this particular Christmas stocking would run
us $845 billion. Worse yet, most of this largesse would wind up in
the pockets or Swiss bank accounts of those various thugs, such as Omar
al-Bashir, Teodoro Obiang Mbasogo, Isayas Afeworki and the
aforementioned Robert Mugabe, who run Africa the way that Al Capone ran
Chicago.
Finally, it’s no business of mine how much of their millions Mr. And
Mrs. Obama send to his relatives in Kenya, but I see no good reason why
the we should have to shell out a plugged nickel.
But, that's with your money. Obama is much tighter with his own.
The Evening Standard reports that Barack Obama has
failed to honor the pledges of
assistance that he made to a school named in his honor when he visited
here amid great fanfare two years ago.
Update: Kenyan-American milblogger Juliette Ochieng at
Baldilocks is setting up a
non-profit called "Save
Senator Obama Kogelo School, Inc" to effect the change the village
had hoped Obama would deliver. |
| Windfall Profits Tax |
Obama's
proposal for a windfall profits tax on oil companies could cost $15
billion a year at last year's profit levels, a campaign adviser said.
The plan would target profit from the biggest oil companies by taxing
each barrel of oil costing more than $80, according to a fact sheet on
the proposal. The tax would help pay for a $1,000 tax cut for
working families, an expansion of the earned-income tax credit and
assistance for people who can't afford their energy bills.
And the oil companies would pass that on to the
consumer -- great idea! |
| The Hard Numbers |
First
hard numbers on the Obama Tax Plan show a dramatic redistribution of
wealth according to a new Tax Foundation analysis.
In Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact, No. 132, Tax Foundation president Scott
Hodge uses revenue estimates from the Tax Policy Center to show that
Obama's plan would greatly accelerate the decades-long trend toward a
federal government that depends for tax revenue almost exclusively on a
few high-income people.
This contrasts starkly with the McCain plan, according to Hodge, which
would give every taxpayer a cut and leave the current tax burden
distribution approximately where it is.
"Under the Obama plan for 2009," explains Hodge, "more than $131 billion
would be redistributed from the top 1 percent of taxpayers to all other
taxpayers."
Obama's plan to punish success is patterned
straight from Karl Marx -- "From each according to his ability, to each
according to his needs."
Of course, Obama has his millions in a "quasi-blind
trust" -- exempt from his "tax the rich" plan. |
| A Trillion Dollar Tax Increase. |
An Obama presidency
could mean a Trillion Dollar tax increase.
The Urban Institute Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center has just
published a detailed analysis and comparison of the tax policies of
Senators McCain and Obama.
It concludes that compared to current policy, McCain would cut taxes by
$628 billion over the next 10 years and that Obama would raise them by
$734 billion over the same period. |
| No Taxes For Obama |
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama would raise taxes on
the rich, but as an investor, he seems eager
to cut his own.
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama wants to raises taxes on
the wealthy, but as a member of that social class, he isn't eager to
fall victim himself. He has invested at least $1 million in a fund that
yields tax-free income.
The Illinois senator's latest campaign-finance disclosure shows that his
investments have nearly tripled in the past two years to as much as $7.4
million, and his income in 2007 surged past $4 million, not counting his
government salary.
Obama reported accounts with Morgan Chase Private Client Asset
Management, an elite firm that deals only with the rich, as well as a
host of retirement accounts, some in the name of his wife, Michelle. |
| No Gifts Either |
Obama has already
endorsed the U.N.-inspired giveaway known as the Global Poverty Act.
It’s estimated that filling this particular Christmas stocking would run
us $845 billion. Worse yet, most of this largesse would wind up in
the pockets or Swiss bank accounts of those various thugs, such as Omar
al-Bashir, Teodoro Obiang Mbasogo, Isayas Afeworki and the
aforementioned Robert Mugabe, who run Africa the way that Al Capone ran
Chicago.
Finally, it’s no business of mine how much of their millions Mr. And
Mrs. Obama send to his relatives in Kenya, but I see no good reason why
the we should have to shell out a plugged nickel.
But, that's with your money. Obama is much tighter with his own.
The Evening Standard reports that Barack Obama has
failed to honor the pledges of
assistance that he made to a school named in his honor when he visited
here amid great fanfare two years ago.
Update: Kenyan-American milblogger Juliette Ochieng at
Baldilocks is setting up a
non-profit called "Save
Senator Obama Kogelo School, Inc" to effect the change the village
had hoped Obama would deliver. |
| Windfall Profits Tax |
Obama's
proposal for a windfall profits tax on oil companies could cost $15
billion a year at last year's profit levels, a campaign adviser said.
The plan would target profit from the biggest oil companies by taxing
each barrel of oil costing more than $80, according to a fact sheet on
the proposal. The tax would help pay for a $1,000 tax cut for
working families, an expansion of the earned-income tax credit and
assistance for people who can't afford their energy bills.
And the oil companies would pass that on to the
consumer -- great idea! |
| Promises To
Raise Taxes |
Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama flatly promised to
raise taxes in a television interview Thursday afternoon.
"I will raise CEO taxes," Obama told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on "The
Situation Room."
"If you’re a CEO in this country you’ll probably pay more taxes," Obama
said. Obama speculated his CEO tax rates "won’t be prohibitively high,
you’ll pay roughly what you did in the 90’s when they were doing fine."
Obama also said he would
eliminate the Bush tax cuts and install what he called a "middle
class tax cut."
Blitzer asked Obama to define "middle class."
Obama replied, "You know, I think the definitions are always a little
bit rough" and said "if you’re making $100,000 a year or less, then
you’re pretty solidly middle class… On the other hand, if you’re making
more than $100,000 and certainly if you’re making more than $200,000 or
$250,000, you’re doing pretty well." |
| Favors Higher Taxes |
Today's Wall Street Journal
publishes a column by former principal deputy commissioner of the
Social Security Administration Andrew Biggs on "Obama's
faulty tax argument."
Like his
improbable history, Obama's argument in favor of higher taxes is
both straightforward and misleading. If Obama is elected
president, we can count on at least two things: bad economic policy and
bad foreign policy. And we won't be able to say we weren't warned. |
| Voted To Raise Taxes 90 Times |
After battling for five months, the Cook County Board has voted to
more than double the county's sales tax, bringing the overall sales
tax in Chicago to be the highest of any major U.S. city at 10.25
percent.
The agreement means a drink at the bar, a fast-food meal and
back-to-school shopping, among other things, will get a bit more
expensive in Cook County.
Vote Obama and double your taxes too!
When Obama talks about change, he's talking about the money he plans to
leave in your pocket.
Did you know, as a U. S senator, Obama has
voted to raise taxes 90 times
-- and on wage-earners
earning as little as $32,000. |
| Obama's Tax Plan Is Really A Welfare Plan |
According to the Wall Street Journal,
Barack
Obama's tax plan is the opposite of supply-side economics. He
proposes to raise marginal rates for just about every federal tax.
He also proposes a raft of tax credits that taxpayers can receive if
they engage in various government-specified activities.
Moreover, the tax credits would mostly go to those who pay little or
nothing in federal income taxes. His trick is to make the tax
credits "refundable." Thus, if the tax credit is for $1,000, but
the taxpayer would otherwise only pay $200 in taxes, the government
would write a check to the taxpayer for $800. If the taxpayer pays
nothing in federal income taxes, the government would pay him the whole
$1,000.
Such credits are not tax cuts. Indeed, they should be called The
New Tax Welfare. In effect, Mr. Obama is proposing to create or
expand a slew of government spending programs that are disguised as tax
credits. The spending on these programs is then subtracted from
the total tax burden, in order to make the claim that his tax plan is a
net tax cut overall. |
| Taxes Will Balloon Deficit |
Sunday's Washington Post carried
a story by reporter Lori Montgomery with a surprising headline:
"Obama Tax Plan Would Balloon Deficit, Analysis Finds." The Post
is highlighting research from the "nonpartisan" Tax Policy Center, a
project of two liberal think tanks, the Brookings Institution and the
Urban Institute.
Measured against current law and against the promises of his fellow
Democrats, Obama would rack up huge deficits. According to a
recent analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, Obama's tax plan
would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt, including interest, by
2018. |
| Will Raise Every Major Federal Tax |
The recently released
details
of Barack Obama's tax plan, published on his campaign website, along
with an article by his top economic advisers in the Wall Street Journal,
confirm that Obama makes Walter Mondale look like a moderate. For
Obama pledges not just to raise taxes. He proposes to raise every
major federal tax. The recently released details confirm that:
* Obama would raise individual income taxes, increasing the top two
income tax rates, with the top rate climbing by 13%, to almost 40%.
This tax increase particularly hits small business, which creates the
most new jobs in America.
* Obama would raise the top capital gains tax rate by 33%, to 20%.
* He would also raise the top dividends tax rate by 33%, to 20% as well.
* He would raise Social Security payroll taxes by 16% to 32% for
families earning over $250,000 a year. He would consequently
arbitrarily punish these families with an effective real return from
Social Security of less than 0%, while making only a minor dent in the
long term Social Security deficit.
* Obama would reinstate the death tax (estate tax) now being phased out
under current law, with a top tax rate of 45%.
* The Obama health plan includes a new payroll tax on employers to pay
for health insurance.
* Obama would impose several specified tax increases on corporations,
including a new so-called windfall profits tax on oil companies.
* Obama's protectionist trade policies would mean higher taxes and
tariffs on trade.
* Obama tries to argue, crassly, that these tax increases would fall
only on "the rich." The tax increasers always start by saying
that. But they always end up reaching down towards the middle
class because that is where the big money is. The federal income
tax was adopted almost 100 years ago with the promise it would only tax
"the rich."
Moreover, the answer to Rick Warren's question as to who the rich are is
small business employers who create most of the jobs, and investors who
finance the jobs. Raising taxes on them ends up hurting the middle
class and working people the most in terms of lost jobs, lower wages,
and a weaker economy, discussed further
HERE. |
| A Living Wage |
A health care mandate is not the only new regulation that
Obama wants to impose. For example, he would require businesses to
pay an undefined "living wage." He would require paid "family and
medical leave." He would regulate mortgages and credit card interest
rates. He would impose a host of environmental and labor restrictions.
The net cost of this regulatory burden almost certainly will be higher
unemployment and greater poverty.
And it's not just businesses that would feel the regulatory hand of an
Obama presidency. Consumers too will have to pay, as he imposes new
costs on products ranging from homes to automobiles and appliances. In
almost everything we do, Obama sees a need for the government to
intervene.
A President Obama would mean a much bigger, more intrusive, and costlier
government. Indeed, when considering his policies, one searches in vain
for any break with liberal orthodoxy. Personal accounts for Social
Security? Entitlement reform? School choice? Obama rejects them all,
calling such proposals, "Social Darwinism." |
| 10 Things You Need to Know |
if you have a retirement account, work in or shop at a small business,
are close or in retirement, or even flip on a light switch, then there
are a few things that you should consider.
Under that plan:
1. Small main street businesses would be forced to pay tax rates as high
as 62.3% under Senator Obama’s tax proposals.
2. Senator Obama’s tax plan would tax small businesses at a higher rate
than Wal-Mart!
3. Taxes on retirement income and savings could increase by at least
33%, hitting millions of seniors when they need these resources the
most.
4. 4 million workers over the age of 50 -- those eagerly looking forward
to retirement -- would be hit with increased tax bills.
5. Millions of Americans would only keep 38 cents of every dollar that
they earn.
6. Senator Obama’s tax plan would reduce the after tax wages of millions
of workers by 17.7%.
7. It will take 227 days per year, nearly 8 months, just to pay your tax
bill!
8. 97,065 carpenters, 110,908 police officers, 254,992 nurses, 208,562
postsecondary teachers and 237,000 dentists would see tax increases, if
the earnings cap was successfully eliminated.
9. 10.3 million workers would see an average of $5,650 taken from their
paycheck and given to government programs.
10. Even YOU might be considered "Rich."
Click Here.
Learn More. |
| Get Ready Middle America |
Barack Obama says he is "agnostic" about raising taxes on households
making less than $250,000 as part of a broad effort to rein in the
budget deficit.
Obama, in a Feb. 9 Oval Office interview, said
that a presidential commission on the budget needs to consider all
options for reducing the deficit, including tax increases and cuts in
spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.
"The whole point of it is to make sure that all ideas are on the
table," Obama said in the interview with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, which
will appear on newsstands Friday. "So what I want to do is to be
completely agnostic, in terms of solutions."
Obama repeatedly
vowed during the 2008 presidential election campaign that he would not
raise taxes on individuals making less than $200,000 and households
earning less than $250,000 a year. When senior White House
economic adviser Lawrence H. Summers and Treasury Secretary Timothy F.
Geithner suggested in August that the administration might be open to
going back on that pledge, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs
quickly reiterated Obama’s promise.
Continue reading
here . . . |
| Obama Will Break Firm Pledge On Taxes |
Grover Norquist
says Barack Obama has some explaining to do. When he signed
the ObamaCare into law, he formally broke his "firm pledge" to the
American people that "no family making less than $250,000 a year will
see any form of tax increase."
Among the 21 tax hikes signed into
law as part of ObamaCare, at least seven directly break Obama’s central
campaign promise. The first of these tax hikes will take effect on
July 1: the excise tax on indoor tanning services -- a 10 percent tax on
the retail price of a tanning session.
Leaving no stone unturned
in their petty hunt for tax revenue, Senate Democrats in December added
the tax behind closed doors at the last minute. There is no
exemption made for families making less than $250,000 per year, thus
violating Obama’s "firm pledge" to the American people.
Local
news coverage from around the country has illustrated the paperwork and
cost burden to salon owners, employees, and customers. The owner
of two salons in Virginia has this to say about the new tax: "It is very
emotional to see your dream being literally shattered by someone in
Washington."
Industry estimates from the Indoor Tanning
Association show that 30 million Americans visit an indoor tanning
facility in a given year, and over 50 percent of salon owners are women. |
| Obama Calls For Bank Tax |
The Daily Caller is
reporting that Barack Obama, fresh from a win on a sweeping overhaul
of Wall Street regulations, on Saturday urged Congress to take up his
proposal for a $90 billion, 10-year tax on banks as the next step in
reform.
Obama wants to slap a 0.15 percent tax on the liabilities
of the biggest U.S. financial institutions to recoup the costs to
taxpayers of the financial bailout.
"We need to impose a fee on
the banks that were the biggest beneficiaries of taxpayer assistance at
the height of our financial crisis -- so we can recover every dime of
taxpayer money," Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address.
With congressional elections looming in November, Obama hopes the
financial reform and the bank tax idea will resonate with U.S. voters
furious over Wall Street risk-taking that led to the financial meltdown
and the worst recession in decades.
Some lawmakers have indicated
they are receptive to the bank tax proposal but others have questioned
whether it is fair to impose the tax on banks that have already repaid
money from the Troubled Asset Relief Fund to make up for losses by
American International Group Inc and General Motors.
"The irony
is it hurts the weaker banks more than the stronger banks," said
Meredith Whitney, a prominent financial services analyst. "To
think that it won’t come out of consumers and businesses is mistaken."
Of course this tax will be
passed on to consumers and businesses. Obama doesn't tell you
about that part -- just the evil bankers.
You must remember,
Marxists need an enemy to attack. Whether it's the
"bourgeoisie," "fat cat bankers" or the "evil oil men," it's all the
same game. |
| Obama Has Already Broken His Tax Pledge |
John Katch
says White House mouthpiece, Robert
Gibbels,
mislead the public about Obama’s broken tax pledge.
White House
spokesman Robert Gibbels seems to have forgotten that his boss has
already broken his central campaign promise -- a "firm pledge" that "no
family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax
increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your
capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."
Responding to a
question during his daily press briefing today, Gibbs said, "The
President believes raising taxes on the middle class during this
economic time would not make a lot of economic sense."
But Obama
has already broken his "firm pledge" at least eight times:
1. Federal Tobacco Tax Hike: On Feb. 4, 2009,
just sixteen days into his presidency, Obama signed into law a 156
percent increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco -- a hike of
62 cents per pack. The median income of smokers is just over
$36,000.
2. The Tax on Indoor Tanning Services took effect
July 1, 2010: This provision of ObamaCare imposes a new 10 percent
excise tax on Americans using indoor tanning salons
3. The
"Medicine Cabinet Tax" takes effect Jan. 1, 2011: Thanks to
ObamaCare, Americans will no longer
be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending
account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to
purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except
insulin).
4. The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike takes effect Jan. 1,
2011: This provision of ObamaCare increases the additional tax on
non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent,
disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged
accounts, which remain at 10 percent.
5. The "Special Needs
Kids Tax" takes effect Jan. 1, 2013: This provision of ObamaCare
imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500
(Currently, there is no federal government limit).
6. The
ObamaCare Medical Prosthetics and Devices Tax takes effect in
January of 2013: This ObamaCare tax raises the price of all medical
prosthetic devices, such as pacemakers and artificial limbs.
7. The Medical Itemized Deductions Cap takes effect Jan. 1, 2013:
Currently, those facing high medical expenses are allowed a
deduction if the total cost if the expenses reduces the filer’s
income by 7.5%. This provision of ObamaCare imposes a
threshold of 10%
8. The ObamaCare Individual Mandate Excise
Tax takes effect Jan. 1, 2014: Anyone not buying "qualifying" health
insurance must pay an income surtax according to the higher in the
following Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) chart (page 71 of manager’s amendment updates Reid bill):
|
|
Single
|
2 People
|
3+ People
|
|
2014
|
$95/1.0% AGI
|
$190/1.0% AGI
|
$285/1.0% AGI
|
|
2015
|
$325/2.0% AGI
|
$650/2.0% AGI
|
$975/2.0% AGI
|
|
2016+
|
$695/2.5% AGI
|
$1390/2.0% AGI
|
$2085/2.5%/AGI
|
Related: The tax hike that
nobody's talking about. That extra $15 bump you're used to
getting each bi-weekly pay period is slated to expire at the end
of the year unless Congress votes to extend the credit.
|
| |

©
Copyright Beckwith 2010
All right reserved
|